JANUARY 26, 1998
1:30 P.M.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
CITY HALL
255 WEST ALAMEDA
TUCSON, ARIZONA
|
ESTIMATED DURATION |
TOPICS |
COMMENTS |
|
5 mins. |
1. Mayor and Council Discussion of Regular Agenda |
|
|
30 mins. |
2. City of Tucson-Northwestern Mexico Relationship (City-Wide) |
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION |
|
20 mins. |
3. Dog Runs In City Parks (City-Wide) |
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION |
|
20 mins. |
4. The Association for the Teleservice Employees (City-Wide) |
REPORT/DISCUSSION |
|
20 mins. |
5. Program Update: "At the Tap" - The Customer Focus on Water Quality Program (City-Wide, Outside the City)
|
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION |
|
10 mins. |
6. Citizens’ Water Advisory Committee (City-Wide) (Continued from 1/12/98 Meeting) |
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION |
|
20 mins. |
7. Department of Intergovernmental Relations Proposed 1998 Legislative Program (City-Wide) |
REPORT/DISCUSSION |
|
5 mins. |
8. Pima Association of Governments (PAG) Regional Council Meeting (City-Wide)
|
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION |
|
5 mins. |
9. Mayor and Council Subcommittees Status Reports (City-Wide) |
|
|
5 mins. |
10. Mayor and Council Discussion of Future Agendas |
|
|
5 mins. |
11. Boards, Committees and Commissions
|
|
RECESS
RECONVENE - 6:30 P.M.
|
45 mins. |
12. JobPath Pilot Job Training Program - Review and Analysis |
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION |
ADDENDUM #1
|
10 mins. |
13.
Selection of In-Depth Sun Tran Audit Issues and Contract Amendment (City-Wide)
|
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION |
|
10 mins. |
14.
Proposed Charter Ammendments (City-Wide)
|
REPORT/DISCUSSION |
1.ROLL CALL
2. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION - Reverend Lee Milligan, The Church of the Painted Hills
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - Mayor and Council, Staff and Public in Attendance
3. CONSENT AGENDA
FOR A COMPLETE DESCRIPTION OF ITEMS
SEE CONSENT AGENDA
Matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine and will be enacted by one motion and one vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is desired by members of the governing body, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately.
A liquor license application will automatically be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered as a separate item by the Mayor and Council if either of the following occurs: A protest against a liquor license application has been received by the City Clerk; OR, A City staff report recommends denial of a liquor license application.
4. WATER: TOLLING AGREEMENT WITH TOWN OF ORO VALLEY
(a)Report from City Manager JAN26-98-47 CITY WIDE
(b)Resolution No. 17928 relating to water; authorizing and approving the execution of a tolling agreement between the Town of Oro Valley and the City of Tucson.
5. ZONING: (C9-95-32) BRECKENRIDGE - PANTANO ROAD, RX-1 TO R-3, CHANGE OF CONCEPT PLAN, MODIFICATION OF CONDITIONS
(a) Report from City Manager JAN26-98-48 WII
(b) Request for a change of concept plan and change of rezoning condition for property located on the east side of Pantano Road approximately one-quarter mile north of Broadway Boulevard. Applicant: Mr. Scott Bernet representing the property owners, Pantano Gardens LLC. The original preliminary development plan was approved for a 108 unit, two-story apartment complex on 3.18 acres for a density of 34 units per acre. The revised preliminary development plan is for a 75 unit, two-story assisted living senior adult care facility and a 44 bed Alzheimer adult care facility. The applicant is also requesting a modification of condition No. 1.d. which requires a 69 foot setback to the east property line. The Planning Department recommends approval of the change of concept plan and change of condition. The City Manager recommends the Mayor and Council approve the requested change of concept plan and condition of rezoning, subject to the following revised conditions and submittal of a development plan in compliance with all conditions and current Code requirements.
| REVISED | 1. | A development plan, in substantial compliance with the revised preliminary development plan, is to be submitted and approved in accordance with Section 5.3.8 of the LUC, including, but not limited to the following. | |||
| REVISED | a. | The maximum building height shall be 30 feet, except that the building height along the easternmost row of buildings shall be restricted to 26 feet, as shown on the revised preliminary development plan | |||
| b. | Architectural elements of the proposed buildings shall
be designed in accordance with the elevation drawings submitted |
||||
| c. | The development plan shall demonstrate how architectural elements are compatible with existing residential land uses, using the following techniques: | ||||
| (1) | Where the subject development is adjacent to R-1 zoned property, balconies shall be directed away from the three existing single-family residences. | ||||
| REVISED | (2) | A variety of rooflines is to be incorporated in the development to break up building mass where building heights are in excess of 20 feet, as |
|||
| REVISED | d. | The minimum building setback from the east property boundary shall be |
|||
| e. | Provide a minimum five-foot-wide landscape buffer along the east property boundary which includes a mix of canopy trees and understory plants. Canopy trees at planting should be of a size that will reach 50 percent of their mature growth within two growing seasons and should be placed at intervals that ensure the canopies will touch at maturity. | ||||
| REVISED | f. | A six-foot-high masonry wall is required along the property line |
|||
| g. | No more than two access points onto Pantano Road shall be permitted, as shown on the preliminary development plan. The owner/applicant is to improve Pantano Road with a right-turn lane, if warranted by a traffic study analysis accepted by the Department of Transportation, along the entire property frontage to serve the two access points and install a new curb and sidewalk. The turn lane will allow the access points to be aligned with the proposed Parking Area Access Lanes (PAALs). | ||||
| h. | The development plan shall include an internal pedestrian and bicycle circulation system that is also connected to Pantano Road. | ||||
| REVISED | i. | Outdoor trash receptacles and loading areas shall be located a minimum of 50 feet away from any adjacent R-1 zone. | |||
| j. | An on-the-ground archaeological site survey shall be conducted, and the results shall be provided at the time of the submittal of the development plan. The findings shall be submitted together with a mitigation plan to the Arizona State Museum, prior to excavation. | ||||
| 2. | Incorporate "Safe by Design" concepts in the development plan, as recommended by the Tucson Police Department. | ||||
| 3. | Outdoor lighting shall be shielded and directed away from adjacent residential zones. | ||||
| 4. | Compliance is required with the guidelines for the handling of desert wildlife provided by the Arizona Game and Fish Department. | ||||
| 5. | Grading of development parcels shall be limited to within four months of actual construction to protect wildlife habitats and to preclude the premature grading of parcels that may cause excessive rainwater runoff from sealed soil conditions. | ||||
| 6. | A drainage report shall be submitted with the development plan. | ||||
| 7. | Any relocation, modification, etc., of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public. | ||||
| REVISED | 8. | Five years, dating from March 18, 1996, are allowed to comply with all Code requirements and conditions of rezoning. | |||
(c) Ordinance No. 9006 relating to zoning: Amending certain rezoning conditions and the preliminary development plan for property in the vicinity of the Eastside of Pantano Road approximately 1500 feet north of Broadway Boulevard in rezoning case C9-95-32 Breckenridge - Pantano Road, RX-1 to R-3.
Two (2) written approvals and zero (0) written protests were received for the original public hearing on January 25, 1996. No additional approvals or protests have been received.
A simple majority vote will be necessary to approve the change of concept plan and change of conditions and adopt the new ordinance.
6. ZONING: (C9-89-20) ESTES - VALENCIA ROAD, O-3 TO C-1, CHANGE OF CONDITIONS
(a) Report from City Manager JAN26-98-49 WI)
(b) Request to consider a change to two conditions of rezoning for a 3.16 acre portion of a 103,250-square-foot shopping center on 11 acres (the majority of the center is zoned C-1) located on the northwest corner of Valencia Road and Commerce Court Road. Applicant: Rick Engineering on behalf of the property owners, Midvale/Valencia LLC. The applicant is requesting the Mayor and Council approve a change of rezoning condition to allow the rezoning to become effective upon the recordation of a subdivision plat rather than only on an approved development plan and to delete a rezoning condition requiring a twenty (20)-foot-wide landscape buffer on a portion of the east property line adjacent to Commerce Court Road. The Planning Department recommends denial of the change of conditions. The City Manager recommends the Mayor and Council deny the change of rezoning conditions. Should the Mayor and Council choose to approve the change of rezoning conditions, it is recommended that the approval be subject to compliance with current Codes and the following conditions of rezoning.
| MODIFIED | 1. |
A |
||
| DELETE |
| |||
| b. | The development site shall be buffered along the north edge with a minimum 50-foot building setback which includes a minimum ten-foot landscaped area. | |||
| c. | Dumpsters and loading zones are to be located a minimum fifty (50) feet from any residential uses or zoning. | |||
| 2. | Additional fire hydrants may be necessary to comply with requirements of the Tucson Fire Code. | |||
| 3. | A drainage report consistent with the Midvale Park Master Drainage Plan/Report is required. | |||
| 4. | Any relocation, modification, etc., of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development shall be at no expense to the public. | |||
| 5. | The owner/applicant is allowed two (2) years to September 11, 1999, to comply with all Code requirements and conditions of rezoning. | |||
| 6. | The installation of an additional lane of paving on the north side of Valencia Road (westbound), east of Commerce Court Road, to accommodate right turns onto Commerce Court Road; and the installation of all Code required improvements on Commerce Court Road are required by the owner/developer. Said turn lane and Code improvements shall be installed coincident with the installation of the first (earliest) driveway access from the subject parcel to Commerce Court Road. | |||
| 7. | Any required or proposed masonry screen walls shall be constructed and/or painted with graffiti-resistant materials and shall be maintained in a graffiti-free condition. The color of the walls shall be complementary to that of the retail center. | |||
| 8. | All security lighting shall be directed downward and away from any adjacent residential uses or residentially zoned areas. | |||
| 9. | Incorporate "Safe by Design" concepts in the development plan submitted to the Community Design Review Committee for review by the Tucson Police Department. | |||
No written approvals and one written protest were received for the original Mayor and Council consideration on this case on September 9, 1989. No additional approvals or protests were received. The protest is within the 150-foot area constituting a 45 percent protest by area to the south and a 5 percent protest by area to the east.
A three-fourths majority vote will be necessary to adopt an ordinance rezoning the subject property once the conditions of rezoning are met.
7. ZONING: (C9-97-21) DeGRAZIA - SWAN ROAD, SR TO RX-2, R-2 AND O-2
(a) Report from City Manager JAN26-98-50 WII
(b) Report from Zoning Examiner dated January 2, 1998
(c) Request to rezone property on the east side of Swan Road approximately 600 to 1240 feet north of the intersection of Swan Road and Fort Lowell Road. Applicant: The Planning Center, on behalf of the property owner, DeGrazia Company LLC. The preliminary development plan is for 125,000 square feet of one and two-story office buildings on 11 acres on Swan Road, 56 single-family units on 7.0 acres west of the Alamo Wash, 28 single-family units on 7.0 acres west of the Alamo Wash and south of the previously described 7.0 acres, and 35 single-family units on 20.0 acres east of the Alamo Wash. Approximately thirty-six (36) of the single-family units are to be developed on adjacent R-1 zoned property to the south in connection with the RX-2 portion of the property. the total number of residential units will be 119. The Planning Department and the Zoning Examiner recommends approval of RX-2, R-2 and O-2 zoning, subject to certain conditions. The City Manager recommends approval of RX-2, R-2 and O-2 zoning, subject to the following conditions.
| 1. | A subdivision plat/development plan, in substantial compliance with the preliminary development plan dated November 5, 1997 and revised November 21, 1997, the submitted Environmental Resource Report, and the Memorandum of Understanding of December 18, 1997, between the DeGrazia Company and the Old Fort Lowell Neighborhood Association is to be submitted and approved in accordance with Section 5.3.8 of the LUC including, but not limited to, the following conditions. | |||
| a. | Development area "A" shall have a maximum of 125,000 square feet of gross floor area on approximately 11 acres. | |||
| b. | Development area "B" shall have a maximum of 56 residential units constructed on approximately 7.0 acres. | |||
| c. | Development area "C" shall have a maximum of 28 residential units constructed on approximately 7.0 acres. | |||
| d. | Development area "D'' and "E" shall have a maximum of 35 residential units constructed on approximately 20 acres. | |||
| e. | Vehicular access for development areas "A and B" shall be from Swan Road or Boggie Drive, with no access from Fort Lowell Road except for emergency purposes. | |||
| f. | Vehicular access for development areas "C, D, and E" shall be from Fort Lowell Road via Pantano Farms Road and the current Douglas Drive. | |||
| g. | Design of all new construction shall be reasonably consistent with the Fort Lowell Historic District Guidelines. | |||
| h. | A minimum 20-foot-wide corridor shall be provided on the east side of the Alamo Wash as described in the Memorandum of Understanding. | |||
| i. | A minimum 10-foot to 30-foot-wide corridor shall be provided on the west side of the Alamo Wash as described in the Memorandum of Understanding. | |||
| j. | A minimum 20-foot-wide corridor shall be provided along the north property boundary of development area "D" as described in the Memorandum of Understanding. | |||
| k. | The existing hedgerow along the eastside of the Alamo Wash Recreational & Aesthetic Corridor and along the north property line of development area "D" shall be preserved, subject to standard horticultural practices. | |||
| l. | All buildings adjacent to Alamo Wash Recreational and Aesthetic Corridor (development areas B, C, D and E) shall be set back a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. | |||
| m. | A maximum of 50% of the footprint of all buildings in development area "A" may be two-story. A maximum of 33% of the gross floor area of all buildings in development area "A" may be on the second story. The maximum building height for one-story buildings is 20 feet and shall be measured from design grade or one-foot above floodplain elevation at the building footprint, whichever is higher. | |||
| n. | One (1) tree per ten (10) parking spaces shall be provided in the parking lots of development area "A". | |||
| o. | A minimum of 50% of the residential units adjacent to the Alamo Wash Recreational and Aesthetic Corridor shall be one-story with a 17-foot maximum height measured from design grade. The remaining units adjacent to the Alamo Wash Recreational and Aesthetic Corridor may have two-story elements with a 24-foot maximum height measured from design grade. Of the two-story units, a minimum of 50% shall have a minimum 20-foot setback from the property line to the second story portion. | |||
| p. | All construction adjacent to Fort Lowell Road shall be one-story; 70% of the total mass will be limited to a maximum of 14 feet in height with the remaining 30% limited to a maximum of 17 feet in height measured from design grade. | |||
| q. | All residential units adjacent to Fort Lowell Road shall have flat roofs and no "mission tile" shall be visible from Fort Lowell Road. | |||
| r. | The required masonry wall for development area "C" shall be setback 20 feet from the Fort Lowell Road right-of-way. This 20-foot setback area shall be developed as a landscaped common area bufferyard. | |||
| s. | All costs of surveys, preparation and recordation of legal documents and other documents required for this development shall be borne by the developer. | |||
| t. | All "new" landscaping along the Alamo Wash Recreational and Aesthetic Corridor, Fort Lowell Road, Swan Road, Boggie Drive and Pantano Farms Drive, or within the Alamo Wash Recreational and Aesthetic Corridor and the Corbett irrigation ditch, shall be native and indigenous to the Old Fort Lowell Neighborhood. | |||
| u. | Landscaping shall utilize water saving irrigation techniques. Stormwater drainage will be designed and directed from all new building construction to benefit landscaped and naturally vegetated areas. | |||
| v. | All signage along Fort Lowell Road shall be reviewed by the Old Fort Lowell Neighborhood Association. | |||
| w. | All site and building lighting will be localized, shielded, directed downward and located away from adjacent properties. | |||
| x. | All new utilities, and where possible, all existing utilities, shall be placed underground. | |||
| y. | Design grades for all development areas shall be based on the Simons, Li and Associates plan dated December 5, 1997. | |||
| 2. | Should Boggie Drive be used for access to any portion of the proposed development, the owner/developer shall be responsible for the following: | |||
| a. | Boggie Drive shall be realigned to match the alignment of the proposed Fort Lowell Road extension west of Swan Road. | |||
| b. | Boggie Drive shall be improved to include a minimum of 24 feet of new pavement, curb, and sidewalk. | |||
| c. | Dedication of 25-foot spandrels at the intersection of Boggie Drive and Swan Road. | |||
| d. | Installation of a right turn lane on Swan Road extending approximately 300 feet south of Boggie Drive. | |||
| e. | Modification of the traffic signal as necessary. | |||
| 3. | A drainage report shall be submitted for approval which includes details of retention/detention, setbacks, and encroachment. | |||
| 4. | The owner/developer shall dedicate the Alamo Wash to the City of Tucson as determined by the approved drainage report. | |||
| 5. | The owner/developer shall dedicate a well site to the City of Tucson as determined necessary by the Tucson Water Department. | |||
| 6. | The owner/developer shall install a maintenance access ramp to the Alamo Wash as required by the Officer of City Engineer. | |||
| 7. | The owner/developer shall be responsible for obtaining the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) that is required to modify the FEMA floodplain. | |||
| 8. | Pedestrian access shall be provided between development area "A" and development areas "B and C"; between development area "B" and development area "C"; between development area "C" and development area "E"; and from development areas "B, C, D, and E" to the Alamo Wash Recreational and Aesthetic Corridor. | |||
| 9. | "Safe by Design" concepts shall be incorporated in the subdivision plat for review by the Tucson Police Department. | |||
| 10. | Any required or proposed masonry screen walls shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials and shall be reasonably consistent with the Fort Lowell Historic District Guidelines. | |||
| 11. | Any relocation, modification, etc., of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development shall be at no expense to the public. | |||
| 12. | Five years are allowed in which to comply with all Code requirements and conditions of rezoning. | |||
Ten (10) written approvals and five (5) written protests have been received. None of the protests are within the 150 foot notification area.
A simple majority vote will be necessary to adopt an ordinance rezoning the subject property once the conditions of rezoning are met.
8. WATER: ANNUAL REVIEW OF CITY WATER POLICIES
(a) Report from City Manager JAN26-98-53 CITY WIDE/OUTSIDE CITY
(b) Resolution No. 17929 relating to water; approving amendments to City water policies.
9. APPEAL: (DSMR-97-29) APPEAL OF THE ZONING EXAMINER’S DECISION TO UPHOLD THE ORIGINAL COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE (CDRC) DETERMINATION - MOUNTAIN VISTA MOBILE HOME COMMUNITY ADDITION
(a) Report from City Manager JAN26-98-45 WI
(b) An appeal of the Zoning Examiner’s decision dated December 9, 1997, upholding the original decision of the Community Design Review Committee (CDRC) to deny a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) to provide relief from Development Standard 2-08.5.1.C which would have allowed the substitute of two-inch thick decomposed granite on compacted subgrade as the construction material for the required sidewalk instead of the standard concrete construction.
The City Manager recommends the Mayor and Council consider the merits of the appeal and vote to uphold, reverse or modify the decision of the CDRC.
10. APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
(a) Report from City Manager JAN26-98-46 CITY WIDE
ADDENDUM #1
11. ZONING: (C9-94-23) FHP, INC. - SWAN ROAD, R-1 TO O-3, CHANGE OF CONCEPT PLAN AND CONDITIONS
(a) Report from City Manager JAN26-98-59 WII
(b) Request for a change of concept plan and change of rezoning conditions for property located on the northeast corner of Swan Road and Glenn Street. Applicant: Elgin/Cohen and Dennehy Architects, representing Miramonte Homes, LLC as prospective purchasers of the property. The original preliminary development plan was approved for one (1) one-story office building with a total floor area of 23,850 square feet. The revised preliminary development plan is for four (4), one-story office buildings with a total floor area of 36,000 square feet. The applicant is also requesting the modification of conditions of rezoning as needed, the deletion of one (1) condition of rezoning and the addition of five (5) conditions of rezoning in order to comply with the recommendations of the Old Fort Lowell Neighborhood Association. The Planning Department recommends approval of the change of concept plan and change of conditions, and adoption of the ordinance presented, subject to the revised conditions of rezoning The City Manager recommends the Mayor and Council approve the requested change of concept plan and conditions of rezoning, and adopt the ordinance presented, subject to the following conditions of rezoning and submittal of a development plan in compliance with all conditions and current Code requirements.
| 1. |
A |
|||
| a. |
The b |
|||
| b. |
The h |
|||
| c. |
The i |
|||
| d. |
All b |
|||
| e. |
The w |
|||
| f. |
The w |
|||
| g. |
The p |
|||
| h. |
All v |
|||
| i. |
|
|||
| j. |
No mirrored glass |
|||
| k. |
All l |
|||
| l. |
Where feasible, drainage/runoff |
|||
| m. |
All p |
|||
| n. |
All l |
|||
| o. |
The d |
|||
| p. |
|
|||
| q. |
|
|||
| r. |
The b |
|||
| s. |
All buildings shall have a m |
|||
| ADD | t. | The maximum gross floor area shall be 36,000 square feet. | ||
| ADD | u. | All air conditioning and heating units shall be ground mounted and screened with walls and/or landscaping to abate noise. Any roof-mounted communications equipment will be screened by a parapet wall. No mechanical equipment or tenant patios are permitted at the east end of Building "D" within 25 feet of the east property line. | ||
| 2. |
The s |
|||
| 3. |
The applicant/developer shall dedicate |
|||
| DELETE | 4. |
|
||
| 5. | A Drainage Report shall be provided which includes detention calculations. | |||
| 6. |
The u |
|||
| 7. |
Any relocation, modification, etc., of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development |
|||
| ADD | 8. | Incorporate "Safe by Design" concepts in the development plan, as recommended by theTucson Police Department. | ||
| ADD | 9. | Outdoor trash receptacle shall be located adjacent to Building "B" as shown on the preliminary development plan. | ||
| ADD | 10. | a. | Five years are allowed in which to comply with all Code requirements and conditions of rezoning. | |
(c) Ordinance No. 9007 relating to zoning: Amending zoning district boundaries in the vicinity of the northeast corner of Swan Road and Glenn Street in case C9-94-23 FHP, Inc. - Swan Road, R-1 to O-3 (Ward 2).
Twelve (12) written approvals and one (1) written protest were received for the original public hearing on November 10, 1994. No additional approvals or protests have been received.
A simple majority vote will be necessary to approve the change of concept plan and change of conditions of rezoning and adopt the new ordinance.
*12. CALL TO THE AUDIENCE, for persons desiring to speak.
*13. ADJOURNMENT
The next scheduled meeting of the Mayor and Council will be held on Monday, February 2, 1998, at 2:00 p.m. in the Mayor and Council Chambers of City Hall, Tucson, Arizona.
*
MONDAY, JANUARY 26, 1998
7:30 P.M.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CITY HALL
255 W. ALAMEDA
TUCSON, ARIZONA
A. GRANT AGREEMENT: WITH ARIZONA CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION FOR DRUG CONTROL AND SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
(1) Report from City Manager JAN26-98-52 CITY WIDE
(2) Resolution No. 17930 relating to grants; approving and authorizing execution of a grant agreement with the Arizona Criminal Justice Commission for Drug Control and System Improvement Program.
B. FINANCE: CONTINGENCY FUND TRANSFER FOR MARTIN LUTHER KING CELEBRATION
(1) Report from City Manager JAN26-98-55 CITY WIDE
(2) Resolution No. 17931 relating to finance; approving and authorizing the transfer of $2,700.00 dollars from the contingency fund to Organization 001-183-1838-268, for the Martin Luther King Celebration for parks and recreation fee waivers.
C. FINANCE: CONTINGENCY FUND TRANSFER FOR THE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
(1) Report from City Manager JAN26-98-56 WI
(2) Resolution No. 17932 relating to finance; approving and authorizing the transfer of six hundred eighty nine ($689.00) dollars from the contingency fund to Organization 001-183-1838-268, for the Habitat for Humanity.
D. FINANCE: CONTINGENCY FUND TRANSFER FOR LAME FOR A GAME - CENTER FOR DISABILITY RELATED RESOURCES
(1) Report from City Manager JAN26-98-57 CITY WIDE
(2) Resolution No. 17933 relating to finance; approving and authorizing the transfer of $2,970.00 dollars from the contingency fund to Organization 001-183-1838-268, for the Lame for a Game - Center for Disability Related Resources for the Tucson Convention Center fee waivers.
E. FINANCE: CONTINGENCY FUND TRANSFER FOR COMMUNITY JOB FAIR
(1) Report from City Manager JAN26-98-58 CITY WIDE
(2) Resolution No. 17934 relating to finance; approving and authorizing the transfer of five thousand ($5,000.00) dollars from the contingency fund to Organization 001-183-1838-268, for the Community Job Fair.
F. INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT: WITH MARICOPA COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOR SUN SOUNDS RADIO READING SERVICES PROJECT
(1) Report from City Manager JAN26-98-54 CITY WIDE
(2) Resolution No. 17935 relating to intergovernmental agreements; approving and authorizing execution of an intergovernmental agreement with the Maricopa County Community College District for funding of the Sun Sounds Radio Reading Services Project for the print-handicapped.
G. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 9, 1997 | June 23, 1997
H. LIQUOR LICENSES
A liquor license application will automatically be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered as a separate item by the Mayor and Council if either of the following occurs: A protest against a liquor license application has been received by the City Clerk; OR, A City staff report recommends denial of a liquor license application.
(1) Report from City Manager JAN26-98-51
(2) RINCON VALLEY FIREFIGHTERS ASSOC., Applicant: Karen A. Hollywood, 710 W. Congress St., SPECIAL EVENT, City No. T004-98, WI
(3) VAIL EDUCATION FOUNDATION, Applicant: Sean M. Payne, 710 W. Congress St., SPECIAL EVENT, City No. T005-98, WI
(4) PIMA AIR & SPACE MUSEUM, Applicant: Jennifer M. Grant, 6000 E. Valencia Rd., SPECIAL EVENT, City No. T006-98, WV
(5) DONATO'S, Applicant: Dimitrios G. Skilas, 1730 E. Prince Rd., PERSON TRANSFER, Series 7, City No. 145-97, WIII
(6) LE MELANGE RESTAURANT, Applicant: Phillip G. Ferranti, 6761 E. Tanque Verde Rd., NEW LICENSE, Series 12, City No. 147-97, WII
(7) TEXACO STARMART, Applicant: Troy J. Lane, SW Corner of Ajo Way/Valley Rd., NEW LICENSE, Series 10, City No. 149-97, WI
(8) CONFUCIAN CHINESE STIR-FRY, Applicant: Loi Tu Phan, 4202 E. 22nd St., PERSON TRANSFER, Series 7, City No. 148-97, WVI
(9) MUTT'S, Applicant: Joshua M. Levine, 424 N. 4th Ave., PERSON TRANSFER, Series 6, City No. 150-97, WVI
(10) FRY'S FOOD STORE #16, Applicant: Dennis R. Hood, 5670 S. Nogales Hwy., NEW LICENSE, Series 10, City No. 151-97, WV
(11) FRY'S FOOD STORE #58, Applicant: Dennis R. Hood, 2001 E. Irvington Rd., LOCATION TRANSFER, Series 9, City No. 152-97, WV
(12) AMERENO'S LITTLE ITALY, Applicant: Victor Amereno, 8240 E. 22nd St., PERSON TRANSFER, Series 7, City No. 153-97, WII
(13) PIONEER VALLEY CLUB, Applicant: Jeffrey S.A. St. John, 2803 E. Valencia Rd., SPECIAL EVENT, City No. T007-98, WV
CONSENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 3-G HAS BEEN AMENDED AND ITEM 3-I AND REGULAR AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 HAVE BEEN ADDED:
AMENDED
G. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: June 9, 1997 (Special Session) | June 23, 1997I. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT: APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERANCE OF AN "AMENDED AND RESTATED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT" WITH RESPECT TO MDWID V. THE CITY OF TUCSON
(1) Report from City Manager JAN26-98-60 CITY WIDE